The California Supreme Court is set to rule on a class action time and attendance lawsuit involving employees' meal and break allowances, the Mercury News reports.
The suit was brought against Brinker International, which operates Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurants. Five lead plaintiffs including Santana Alvarado, who worked at a Concord Chili's for more than eight years, allege they had trouble getting their bosses to give them meal breaks and were forced to eat in a store room.
The plaintiffs claim this violated California labor laws. The Supreme Court must consider whether employers only have to provide the opportunity for breaks or ensure workers actually take them.
"The reality is, if meal periods are optional, very few workers are going to get them," said Kim Kralowec, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, as quoted by the news source.
Last month, a National Conference of Synagogue Youth chapter advisers from California filed a similar lawsuit against the Orthodox Union, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Devorah Lunger claimed she was not provided with rest or meal breaks and was not paid for overtime employee attendance.
All data and information provided on this news blog is for informational purposes only. Infinisource makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. Information regarding employment suits and other legal action is not updated after publication, and may not be current.
Related Headlines